ECA Watch: International NGO Campaign on Export Credit Agencies Export Credit Agencies: A Ball and Chain for People and the Environment
home what are ecas? the problems goals take action! press room about us

Information in: Español - Français - Deutsch - Português - Russian - Japanese - Svenska - Italiano - Suomi

The Problems
*
*
*


view ECA Watch




 

Search ECA Watch



NGOs Demand Rigorous Safety Assessment for Nuclear Projects

Media Release

July 27, 2009 Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JACSES), Citizens' Nuclear Information Center, Friends of the Earth Japan and Mekong Watch

Public Finance and Export Insurance for Nuclear-Related Exports NGOs Demand Rigorous Safety Assessment, Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Involvement

Tokyo, July 27, 2009

Japanese NGOs concerned about the social and environmental impacts of proposed exports of nuclear power plants today submitted demands to the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI). The submission demanded rigorous safety assessment, information disclosure and meaningful stakeholder involvement for projects supported by JBIC and NEXI. (1)

The Japanese Government is vigorously promoting nuclear exports by Japanese industry. It intends to support such exports through public finance from JBIC and export insurance from NEXI. However, JBIC and NEXI lack adequate guidelines for the assessment of nuclear related issues, such as safety, accident response and radioactive waste management. Furthermore, access to information and stakeholder involvement in relation to projects’ nuclear component is not guaranteed. (2)

Considering the problems encountered with Japan's own nuclear power program, it can be expected that promoting nuclear power in developing countries, which often suffer from governance problems and lack the necessary democratic participatory processes and technical skills, will involve even greater risks. We believe that it is inappropriate to provide public finance and insurance for nuclear exports to countries facing problems such as these. (3) However, the government is clearly determined to support nuclear exports. Under these circumstances, we demand that the government exercise the utmost caution when considering proposals for public finance and export insurance for nuclear projects.

The submission's main points are as follows:

  • Public support should not be provided for nuclear-related projects in regions of tension and regions where terrorism is rife, or for projects in politically unstable countries.
  • Safety standards at least as high as those in Japan should be required.
  • The details and the efficacy of management and disposal plans for radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, should be confirmed.
  • Appropriate standards and monitoring systems in regard to worker radiation exposure should be in place.
  • Adequate access to information and stakeholder involvement should be assured.
  • Proposals should be reviewed by an independent review committee.

The submission was submitted by the following four Japanese NGOs.

  • Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JACSES)
  • Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center
  • Friends of the Earth Japan
  • Mekong Watch

In addition to these four NGOs, the submission was endorsed by 15 other Japanese NGOs.

Footnotes

1. The submission (Japanese only) is available on the following web site: http://cnic.jp/english/topics/international/jbic.pdf

2. Support by JBIC and NEXI for nuclear-related projects was discussed during the public consultation process for last year's review of JBIC's and NEXI's environmental and social guidelines, but rules covering such projects were not included in the revised guidelines, which were released last week. However, in a response dated November 11, 2008 to a question by Diet Member Masamichi Kondoh, the government said,"JBIC will produce guidelines that ensure that finance is not provided for [nuclear] projects where the project proponent has not provided appropriate information to residents in regard to confirmation of the project's safety, accident response and management of radioactive waste." The government did not indicate that NEXI intended to produce such guidelines.

3. Note that the demands in the NGOs' submission apply to both developing and developed countries.

Contacts:

  • Philip White (Citizens' Nuclear Information Center):
  • Eri Watanabe (Friends of the Earth Japan):
  • Citizens' Nuclear Information Center

Note: International NGOs called last month for an OECD ECA time-out on renegotiation of the Sector
Understanding on Renewable Energies, pending full transparency and robust public participation in discussions over the appropriateness and adequacy of enhanced terms, and by extending the existing enhanced terms for six months. They reconfirmed their continued opposition to preferable financing terms for nuclear power and large hydropower projects.

Meanwhile, US business interests are promoting a business case for a nuclear renaissance with demands for Federal and State government assistance (i.e. subsidies), including debt financing from export credit agencies, municipal power authorities and generation and transmission cooperatives.

 

 

Home | What are ECAs? | The Problems | Goals | Take Action! | Press Room | About Us For Questions or Comments, email info_at_eca-watch.org
To report broken links and/or technical difficulties, email webmaster_at_eca-watch.org
View our Privacy Statement