|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Information in: Español - Français - Deutsch - Português - Russian - Japanese - Svenska - Italiano - Suomi |
||||||||||||
|
Large Dams
Power Finance: Financial Institutions
in India's Hydropower Sector Published by International Rivers Network, Urgewald and the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People This new report examines the latest trends in financing hydropower projects. Based on India's experience, it untangles the complicated web by which large dams are now being funded through financial intermediaries. It analyses the problems the new funding mechanisms create, and demonstrates how NGOs and social movements can press for accountability, human rights and environmental protection in a new era of indirect financing. Dams have long been among the most controversial of development projects. As a consequence of growing public concerns about environmental destruction and human rights violations, international financial institutions have to a large extent withdrawn from funding large dams. "We are almost gun-shy of dams now", says Preben Nielsen of the Asian Development Bank. "The risks are great, the visibility is high, and the vulnerability is a constant concern." Most bilateral institutions have also stopped funding large dams. As the examples of Ilisu (Turkey) and Maheshwar (India) demonstrate, even export credit agencies have begun to reconsider their involvement in the sector. International funding agencies, however, are increasingly supporting domestic financial intermediaries and utilities involved in developing hydropower projects. Straightforward project lending has been substituted by a maze of indirect financing. India's Power Finance Corporation, the China Development Bank and other domestic institutions raise funds from foreign lenders and channel them into projects which international financial institutions and banks would no longer dare to touch directly . Who shares the responsibility for projects funded through financial intermediaries? What policies are applied? Whom can affected people hold accountable when projects are funded through intermediaries? And what strategies can NGO networks use to integrate environmental and human rights concerns into the new financing mechanisms? Power Finance addresses these questions based on India's recent experience.
It analyses in detail the role of government institutions and private
investors, banks and insurance companies in the funding of hydropower
projects in India. And it examines how multilateral and bilateral development
institutions, export credit agencies and Power Finance demonstrates why financial institutions again and again
end up funding uneconomic and destructive projects. Project appraisal
by domestic financial institutions is skewed by the vested interests of
private contractors and their political allies. International financial
institutions focus on privatization in their power sector reforms, and
neglect a balanced assessment of all options including efficiency gains.
They extend large loans to power utilities and financial intermediaries
which in turn fund wasteful and destructive power projects. In some cases
(such as the World Bank's International Finance Corporation), they do
not even inform the public, or affected people, about the projects they
support through financial intermediaries. The new report concludes with
a list of recommended actions and policy changes to address these problems. The report can be ordered from:
|
|||||||||||
|
Home | What
are ECAs? | The Problems | Goals
| Take Action! | Press
Room | About Us
For Questions or Comments, email info_at_eca-watch.org
To report broken links and/or technical difficulties, email webmaster_at_eca-watch.org View our Privacy Statement |
||||||||||||