(Yahoo Finance, Brazil, 20 June 2023) SBM Offshore is pleased to announce it has signed the project financing of its floating production storage and offloading unit (FPSO) Alexandre de Gusmão for a total of US$1.615 billion. The project financing is provided by a consortium of 12 international banks with insurance cover from 3 international Export Credit Agencies. It will have a processing capacity of 180,000 barrels of oil and 12 million m3 of gas per day. The FPSO construction is progressing as per plan with the expected first oil in the second half of 2024. FPSO Alexandre de Gusmão is owned and operated by special purpose companies owned by affiliated companies of SBM Offshore (55%) and its partners (45%). The FPSO will be deployed at the Mero unitized field located in the Santos Basin approximately 160 kilometers offshore Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, under a 22.5-year lease and operating contract with Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. The Mero unitized field is operated by Petrobras (38.6%), in partnership with Shell Brasil (19.3%), TotalEnergies (19.3%), CNPC (9.65%), CNOOC (9.65%) and Pré-sal Petróleo S.A. – PPSA (3.5%), representing the Government in the non-contracted area. [Despite very extensive press coverage of the project, not one article mentions which 3 ECAs are providing insurance coverage.]
Oil & Gas
How Major Economy’s ECAs are Breaking their own Climate Change Pledges
(Byline Times, London, 16 June 2023) OECD countries are continuing to pour tens of billions of pounds into fossil fuel projects, despite their obligations to switch to clean energy sources. Advanced economies are breaking their own climate change obligations by investing massively in fossil fuels rather than switching to clean energy sources, according to a landmark new report. The OECD’s export finance initiatives are in contravention of internationally-determined climate change obligations. In 2021, 39 governments signed the Clean Energy Partnership at the COP26 conference in Glasgow, an agreement which committed to “driving multilateral negotiations in international bodies, in particular in the OECD, to review, update and strengthen their governance frameworks to align with the Paris Agreement goals”. Yet despite 52% of OECD countries having signed the Partnership agreement, fossil gas received 30% of all OECD export finance between 2018 and 2020. The report confirmed that “despite long standing commitments to align financial flows with climate goals, public finance and, in particular, export finance remains skewed in favour of fossil energy”.
OECD allows support for fossil-based technologies under agreed ‘climate incentives’
(Price of Oil, Paris, 23 June 2023) The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently agreed on terms and conditions for climate-friendly export financing as part of its revised Climate Change Sector Understanding (CCSU). While the agreement enables incentives for renewable energy projects like solar and wind, it also provides incentives for hydrogen and ammonia, including fossil gas derived hydrogen, and fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The agreement does nothing to restrict oil and gas financing. The OECD’s export credit agencies are the world’s largest international public financiers of fossil fuels. Recent analysis by Oil Change International shows that OECD countries supported fossil fuel exports by an average of $41 billion from 2018 to 2020, almost five times more than their clean energy support ($8.5 billion) over the same period. As such, OECD Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) play a critical role in propping up high-emitting projects, such as LNG infrastructure, which in turn shapes our future global energy system. For example, OECD ECAs have supported 56 percent of new hazardous liquified gas (LNG) export terminal capacity built in the last decade. According to International Energy Agency (IEA) and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios, maintaining a 50% chance to limit global warming to 1.5°C requires an immediate end to investments in new oil, gas, and coal production and LNG infrastructure. This underlines an urgent need for the OECD to, as called for by over 175+ CSOs, end export support for new fossil fuel projects.
UK’s top court rejects Friends of the Earth’s appeal over government’s funding for Mozambique LNG project
(Upstream Online, London, 23 June 2023) The UK’s top court has thrown out an application by Friends of the Earth (FoE) to appeal a case it lost earlier this year against the government’s funding of TotalEnergies’ $20 billion Mozambique LNG project. FoE had argued in the Court of Appeal in January this year that the UK should not have provided export credit finance to the huge liquefied natural gas project because it went against the government’s climate change policy and failed to adequately take into account Scope 3 emissions from the scheme.
Indonesia’s Pertamina reaches $3.1 billion ECA and bank financing deal for Balikpapan oil refinery
(Reuters, Jakarta, 24 June 2023) Indonesia’s state energy company Pertamina (PERTM.UL) reached a $3.1 billion financing deal with a number of export credit agencies and commercial banks to fund the upgrade of its Balikpapan refinery, the company said on Saturday. The lenders include export credit agencies from South Korea, Italy and the United States, and 22 commercial banks. Pertamina will use the funds for the expansion of its Balikpapan oil refinery to a capacity of 360,000 barrels per day (bpd), from 260,000 bpd. Pertamina claims it will be able to produce more environmentally friendly fuels. [Oil Change International noted in May that US President Biden has broken a major G7 climate promise by financing this Indonesian oil refinery.]
Comments to NEXI opposing Cameron LNG
SWEDWATCH: The EU must urgently review its outdated policy on export credits
(Swedwatch, Stockholm, 27 April 2023) Despite promises to make financial flows consistent with a low-carbon economy, EU member states continue to provide financial support to the fossil fuel industry through export credits. It is time that the EU Commission replaces its outdated policy with new and ambitious regulation, prohibiting export support to oil and gas, Swedwatch argues in a new policy paper. “Export credit agencies are the world’s largest international public financiers of fossil fuels. In the EU, the lack of an ambitious regulatory framework allows for oil and gas projects to continue to be supported through state-backed export finance, undermining EU contributions to climate goals. This gap needs to be urgently addressed“, says Davide Maneschi, climate change program officer at Swedwatch. Export credit agencies (ECAs) have a critical role in the energy transition, as they de-risk large scale infrastructure and energy projects. However, in the period 2019-2021, some six years after the Paris Agreement was signed, G20 export credit agencies provided seven times more support for exports of fossil fuel projects than for clean energy. In an April 27 policy paper Swedwatch calls on the European Commission to promptly initiate a reform of the regulatory framework on the activities of ECAs, ensuring that they are aligned with the Paris Agreement 1.5°C climate change mitigation goals and EU climate objectives.
Export credit market shows strong growth: Berne Union
(Reinsurance News, Brighton, 15 May 2023) Berne Union, the global association for the export credit and investment insurance industry, has reported that its market showed “strong growth” across business lines in 2022 and a fall in claims paid overall. Highlights from the year’s data show that the export credit industry supported $2.83 trillion of cross-border trade and investment with an additional $68.6bn in non-cross-border support for exporters. Berne Union notes that growth has been supported by the return of significant transactions in the transportation sector as well as a large expansion of manufacturing sector project. The report notes that renewable energy transactions also continue to increase and are close to doubling 2019 levels, while commitments for natural resources continue to decline now at just 33% of their 2019 levels. Total claims paid fell from $9 billion to $7.6 billion over 2022, following a notable drop in MLT transportation claims which had spiked in the first stages of the pandemic. [However as noted in other articles of this issue of What’s New, ECAs poured 77% of their spending into fossil fuel projects between 2018 and 2020, making claims for increased renewable energy transactions almost irrelevant! ]
Tiwi Islanders protest Santos’ Barossa gas project in Australia
(Upstream, Perth, 29 May 2023) Australian oil giant Santos denied claims of human rights abuses against Indigenous Australians relating to domestic gas and LNG projects planned or under development that have been alleged to some of the company’s investors and financiers. Equity Generation Lawyers, which bills itself as specialists in Australian climate change law, early last month filed human rights grievances against financial institutions supporting the Barossa gas project located in waters off northern Australia. Those financial institutions included Australia’s ANZ and Westpac, DNB Bank of Norway, Singapore’s DBS Bank and three Japanese banks. In tandem, export credit agencies in Japan and South Korea that are set to provide financial support to Santos’ project partners from those nations also received letters of complaint. The company has more than 90 agreements in place across Australia that relate to native title, Aboriginal land rights and cultural heritage management, involving six Aboriginal Land Councils and 23 Traditional Owner groups.
China trails global financial firms in committing to end investments in coal projects
(South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, 4 May 2023) The number of financial institutions globally that have committed to coal divestments has doubled in the past three years, but it remains negligible in China, according to a new IEEFA study. While more than 200 “globally significant” companies now have formal policies restricting investment in coal mining or coal-fired power projects, just three financial institutions from China have established a formal coal policy,
