(New Civil Engineer, London, 19 November 2024) UKEF has launched a new product aimed at aiding British companies in securing international contracts. The Early Project Services Guarantee (EPSG) is the latest initiative to support firms offering engineering, design and technical services on a global scale. The EPSG is designed to assist overseas buyers who opt for British service companies in the initial planning phases of their projects. When an international buyer plans a major project and requires early work such as feasibility studies or conceptual designs, they can engage a UK design service firm. Under the EPSG scheme, this buyer can then seek a guarantee to secure a loan from a bank. This loan enables them to finance the early work provided by the UK business, with repayment terms spanning up to two years. Meanwhile, the UK service provider receives payment upon completion of services, contingent on the loan’s terms.
Newsletter
‘The finance Cop’ delivers a fragile climate pledge, but leaves questions unanswered
(Global Trade Review, London, 27 November 2024) The two-week-long UN Climate Change Conference (Cop29) ended last week with a contentious pledge by wealthy countries to increase climate finance. While the commitment was criticised by developing nations as insufficient, objections from some of the world’s richest nations meant there was nearly no agreement at all. The landmark pledge of Cop29, nicknamed “the finance Cop” due to its supposed focus on funding the green transition, was an increase of climate finance from the wealthiest countries to the poorest from US$100bn to US$300bn a year by 2035. While this is a clear upgrade – and higher than the originally proposed US$250bn – it is far less than the US$1.3tn that developing countries had sought. It is also unlikely to be enough to mitigate the effects of climate change, with NGO WaterAid’s lead policy analyst for water, sanitation and hygiene finance, Lesley Pories, calling it a “death sentence for the millions on the climate frontlines”. Though the official text of the resolution calls for financing from “all public and private sources” to reach US$1.3tn a year by 2035, it is unclear in practice how this will materialise.
Ex-Im Bank’s $2.5 billion Angola loan funds Chinese-tied firms, not American jobs
(Washington Examiner, Washington, 10 November 2024) The U.S. Export-Import Bank faces scrutiny over a $2.5 billion giveaway to green energy development in Angola that benefits foreign companies with ties to China and the Angolan president, despite the bank’s claims that it will support thousands of American jobs. The Ex-Im Bank, led by Biden administration appointee Reta Jo Lewis, loaned over $900 million in June 2023 and another $1.6 billion to American company Sun Africa, which is in charge of developing solar energy plants, mini-grids, and storage and water treatment facilities in Angola. The largest-ever Ex-Im loans were issued as part of the Biden administration’s flagship global infrastructure partnership and the China and Transformational Exports programs, which seek to support American companies competing against China. The bank touts that the financing will support over 4,700 American jobs. Despite the bank’s statements that the financing agreement benefits American exports and jobs, the announced suppliers are foreign companies and include firms close to Angolan President João Lourenço or frequent contractors to the Chinese government, the Washington Examiner can reveal.
U.S. Misses the Mark on ECA Fossil Fuel Finance Agreement
(Friends of the Earth, Washington, 21 November 2024) Today at the conclusion of the OECD Export Credit Group negotiations, participating nations failed to reach an agreement on fossil fuel finance, despite scientists’ repeated calls for urgent climate action. While no formal conclusion has been announced from the talks, the United States appears to have failed to secure an agreement. The proposal has already been championed by the European Union, UK, Canada, Norway and most recently, Australia. It would have potentially restricted financing for the entire fossil fuel value chain. Up to $40 billion per year could be shifted away from fossil fuels to renewable energy projects. This would have paved the way for the agreement to be presented as part of a climate finance package at COP29. Unlike the Paris Agreement, it would have been difficult for the Trump Administration to remove itself from just one piece of the arrangement.
Saudi Neom Gets $3 Billion Loan Guarantee From Sace
(BNN Bloomberg, Toronto, 13 November 2024) Italy’s state insurance and financial group will grant Saudi Arabia $3 billion in loan guarantees to help the kingdom develop a sprawling futuristic megacity. Insurer and export credit agency Sace agreed on 80% guarantees for loans from international banks backing Neom, the ambitious project to build a new urban area that will be bigger than Belgium, according to people familiar with the matter.
Europe and U.S. push for oil-funding ECA curbs deal to outlast Trump
(Philadelphia Tribune, 22 November 2024) The EU, U.S. and other countries are hammering out a plan to throttle tens of billions of dollars of financial support for foreign oil and gas projects, weeks before President-elect Donald Trump moves into the White House. Negotiators are working toward landing a deal at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development gathering in Paris by Thursday, according to people familiar with the matter. An agreement would be a culmination of more than a year of effort to expand existing rules that prohibit member nations’ export-credit agencies from financing unabated coal projects. It’s an about-turn for the U.S., which had effectively stalled work on the broader fossil fuel restrictions for months amid concerns from the country’s Export-Import Bank. But with Trump taking office in two months, it’s a last-ditch bid to lock in a climate policy that environmental advocates say be difficult for the new administration to reverse while freeing up multibillion-dollar funds for global clean energy projects. The group’s members have a longstanding gentlemen’s agreement that effectively allows them to use export-credit agencies to give preference to domestic companies in international deals without running afoul of WTO rules. Member countries have an incentive to abide by the policies since they help ensure a level playing field. Restricting export-credit agency support for fossil fuels is viewed as crucial to meet global climate goals, a year after nearly 200 countries agreed to transition away from polluting energy sources. “There aren’t many policy tools that Trump can’t undo, and this is one of the few,” said Laurie van der Burg, Public Finance lead at Oil Change International. Oxfam America notes that: “A ‘Trump-proof’ climate deal of this magnitude is mission critical for the Biden administration — not only to secure its legacy on climate progress, but also help safeguard every community, both in the U.S. and globally, from damaging storms, heat waves, and rising seas. The climate crisis won’t stop for a climate denier in the White House, and this is the last chance for the current administration to stop billions in global handouts to fossil fuel corporations.” Nearly 300 green groups have urged Biden to block LNG expansion ahead of Trump.
Oxfam calls for a green overhaul of the US Export-Import Bank
(Hacker News, Mountain View CA, 17 October 2024) As mounting climate concerns cause extreme weather events, & global efforts intensify to keep warming below 1.5°C, Oxfam calls on the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM) to cease funding fossil fuel projects to instead champion just & clean energy initiatives. In a new research report published today, “Alignment of the United States Export-Import Bank with the US climate & development policy objectives,” Oxfam America & Perspectives Climate Research found that EXIM has financed hundreds of fossil fuel projects globally since its founding & continues to finance the most climate damaging sectors: at least 60% of its current $40+ billion portfolio directly supports fossil fuel-producing or dependent sectors like oil, gas, & aviation. Despite a requirement in its charter to devote 5% of its funding to renewable energy, energy efficiency, & storage, in 2021, only $72 million – or 1.25% of EXIM’s new authorizations – were considered environmentally beneficial, & only 0.2% were for renewable energies.
Petrochemical Plant Wins EXIM Loan Despite Biden Climate Vow
(Bloomberg, New York, 11 October 2024) The US Export-Import Bank authorized a $690 million loan to help build a petrochemical plant in Malaysia, despite objections from climate activists who say the project flouts Biden-Harris administration promises to halt financing for fossil fuel projects abroad. The loan approved Thursday and disclosed Friday comes amid intensifying scrutiny of how independent US agencies are addressing climate change following decisions that run counter to President Joe Biden’s environmental agenda. In 2021 Biden issued an executive order vowing to curb public funding of climate-damaging ventures and the US signed a pledge with 33 other nations committing to halt such support.
ECAs prepare to lock horns over fossil fuel financing
(Global Trade Review, London, 14 October 2024) Ahead of crunch talks within the OECD Arrangement, climate groups are pressuring the US, Korea and Japan to agree to a comprehensive proposal that would halt billions of dollars in fossil fuel financing each year. In recent days, over 40 environmental and social activity groups have written to members of the OECD Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits, urging them to expand an existing ban on coal financing to also include oil and gas projects. Export credit agencies (ECAs) are among the world’s largest backers of fossil fuel transactions, often in developing regions such as Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Climate groups argue their support – in the form of guarantees, insurance and loans – can be vital in ensuring projects reach financial close. In the past year, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (US Exim) has seen two advisors on its climate board quit over a US$500mn loan guarantee backing oil and gas field expansion in Bahrain, while Japan’s agency has come under fire for financing a new gas field in Western Australia. Friends of the Earth, Oil Change International and BankTrack are among the signatories of the letter, which says it is “unthinkable that OECD agencies continue to pour billions into fossil fuel projects”.
NGOs urge banks & China to refuse support for Ugandan oil projects
(Mongabay, Menlo Park, 17 October 2024) A group of 28 NGOs have written to 34 banks, insurance companies and the Chinese government, urging them to deny financing and other support for oil and gas projects in Uganda. The letters, written by U.S.-based Climate Rights International (CRI) and 27 Africa-based NGOs, follow a report detailing numerous human rights violations and environmental harms at the Kingfisher oil project sites in Uganda. Similarly, Uganda’s Tilenga oil fields also face scrutiny over their ecological and social harms, including impacts on wildlife and displacement of local communities. Both Kingfisher and Tilenga are co-owned by French oil and gas giant TotalEnergies, the Chinese National Offshore Oil Company Uganda Ltd. (CNOOC), and the Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC). Both projects are also part of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline initiative (EACOP), where TotalEnergies is a major partner. The initiave aims to transport oil and gas from Uganda to Tanzania for export.
